Featured
Table of Contents
Federal funding cuts; attacks on equity, immigrants, the guideline of law, and the country's democracy; a new tax bill; and the growing usage of synthetic intelligence are just some of the elements that have actually overthrown the nonprofit world. Amidst this turmoil, how can funders and their beneficiaries prepare for 2026 and beyond? In this special bundle, you'll hear from foundation leaders and significant donors about offering patterns in the coming year and efforts to react to Trump administration risks.
You'll find bold forecasts from leaders and thinkers throughout the sector about what lies ahead, including what the sector will look like five years from now, and how to react to what promises to be another unmatched year. It's time to shed our worry and acknowledge that those who want modification will fail if the people closest to the money lack the guts to bear the most risk.
Kathleen Enright, president & CEO, Council on Foundations The humanitarian sector must be clear-eyed about the difficulties ahead: the pattern of targeted attacks and government overreach developed to suppress our most essential flexibilities. John Palfrey, president, MacArthur Structure Nonprofits are addicted to the hamster wheel of fundraising, and in 2026, AI might supersize both the wheel and the addiction.
Michael McAfee, CEO, PolicyLink It's challenging to picture passage anytime soon of legislation needing higher payment rates. Bella DeVaan and Chuck Collins coordinate the Charity Reform Initiative, Institute for Policy Studies Communication is no longer background sound.
Dimple Abichandani, author of A New Era of Philanthropy. Lighthouse illustration by Greg Mably for The Chronicle of Philanthropy.
Findings from Church Mutual can help guide nonprofits as they navigate 2026 and modifications in generational providing. In December of 2025, the "2026 Charitable Giving Up America" survey was conducted by Church Mutual, taking reactions from 1,010 grownups who contribute financially to nonprofits and other charitable causes. According to a post on the study from NonProfitPro, Church Mutual suggests multiple important patterns within the nonprofit fundraising world, including the worrying reality that donors are planning to downsize their providing in 2026.
Why annual reflection and gratitude Resonate with Corporate Offering PartnersWith that, here are five essential takeaways from the Church Mutual 2026 survey: The Church Mutual survey discovered holy places continue to take in the lion's share of contributions. All 4 generations represented (Gen Z, millennials, Gen X, and Child Boomers) contributed primarily to places of praise, constituting 74% of charitable donations.
Organizations that have religious ties must stress this connection to donors, specifically if they actively support homes of praise or schools. Another important finding from the study was that donors tended to make their contributions toward the end of the year (OctoberDecember). Throughout the 4 generations, end-of-year donations comprised the greatest portion, with JanuaryMarch taking 2nd location, followed by AprilJune, then JulySeptember.
Additionally, out of the four generations, Gen Z was probably to give throughout the slowest time of the year (JulySeptember). Those who work in the not-for-profit space should bear in mind of the end-of-year increase in donations, which indicates that OctoberDecember projects such as Offering Tuesday events, matches, and so on, could bring in a fundraising windfall.
That said, "slow-down" durations ought to not be ignored, as the younger generations may still be inclined to offer even when the older ones are not. The study includes a section that details "donation expectations" for 2026, and it is these findings that may sound alarm bells. On the one hand, around half of donors (48%) stated they will not make any modifications to their financial contributions, with Boomers being the group most likely to leave their charitable giving unchanged.
Millennials were recognized as the group most likely to cut their offering, whereas Gen Z was not only identified as the group least likely to cut their providing, however likewise the group more than likely to increase their giving up 2026. Church Mutual has a couple of sections committed to the main monetary issues of donors, something that falls beyond the scope of this post.
One finding that nonprofits ought to also understand is that a bulk of donors have issues about the financial health of the groups they support. Church Mutual found that 54% of donors are stressed over the financial health of the receivers of their donations. By generation, Gen Z was the most concerned, followed by millennials and Gen X respectively, while Boomers were the least worried.
They should be prepared to deal with younger donors' concerns and be proactive in resolving any concerns afflicting the company internally. Doing so might make a distinction in winning over more youthful donors during financially unsure times. While lower financial contributions might be worrisome for nonprofits, there might be some excellent news.
When asked if they would increase "effort and time" to help in other methods must they lower their financial donations, a majority of donors indicated they would; 26% stated they were "really likely" and 32% said "rather likely," equating to 58% of donors overall. The research study recommends these responses could indicate "strong potential to transform minimized monetary offering into more volunteering, advocacy, or other non-financial assistance." In the face of smaller sized financial contributions, nonprofits need to lean into other channels to engage their donors.
There are other findings from Church Mutual that were not covered in this short article, such as donation methods and the leading financial top priorities of donors, therefore I motivate all those in the nonprofit area to review the report. The findings from Church Mutual can help assist nonprofits as they browse 2026, specifically as Gen Z starts to handle a more prominent role in the giving world.
Subscribe to the Johnson Center's email newsletter! This year marks a turning point for the Johnson Center: the tenth edition of our 11 Patterns in Philanthropy report. What started in 2017 as a modest supplement to our annual report has actually become a commonly read and discussed publication, reaching more than 100,000 readers each year.
Typically, these short articles check out brand-new shifts or developing movements throughout the field of philanthropy. For this tenth edition, however, we have actually taken a various technique. Rather than identifying a completely new set of emerging patterns, we have turned our attention backwards to show on the styles that have actually shaped our sector over the past 10 years, and to call both sustaining shifts and new developments.
It is likewise an acknowledgment of the minute we find ourselves in a moment of hyper disruption, that combines both terrific anxiety about where we are headed and terrific possibility for what might follow. Our future feels more uncertain than ever, however the chance to produce and scale life-altering innovations for our communities feels present.
As executive orders, legal contests, and legal debates play out, we do not have a clear image of just how much federal financing has actually been rescinded or kept from nonprofits and neighborhoods. We do not understand how numerous nonprofits have actually closed or will close their doors, how many staff have lost their tasks, or the number of neighborhoods have actually lost access to crucial services.
Latest Posts
Expert Programmatic Tips for Conversions
Top Advantages of AI Search Tools
Analyzing Non-Profit Versus Business Giving Models